132 procedures across 15 specialties — and growing
One Place. Complete Consent.
Informed. Transparent. Trusted.
For clinicians, by a clinician · Free, always
Please read this once. It takes under a minute.
Every figure in this tool is drawn, as far as possible, from published research and named guideline bodies — among them NAP3, NAP4, RA-UK, BSG, BAUS, NJR, RCOphth, RCOG and SHOT. Each figure shows its source, and the mechanism behind it, when you tap ⓘ.
Figures describe populations studied in the literature. They are not adjusted for the person in front of you. You may change any number, and the document prints your figure. Clinical judgement remains yours.
A structured record of a consent discussion. It is not a legal instrument and does not replace a consent form your institution requires. Nothing you enter leaves this device.
You are never asked for patient details. Name, hospital number and date of birth are printed as blank fields and completed by hand at the bedside — so the document is complete, and the app holds nothing about your patient.
What leaves this device, and what does not. The consent document, your assessment, the conditions and medication you record, and every figure you change stay on this device and are cleared when you close the app. Two things do leave: anonymous usage counts — which procedures are searched for, which figures clinicians change — and the feedback survey, if you choose to send it. Before the survey is sent you are shown the exact contents. Neither carries anything about a patient.
Each procedure needs published figures and review before it can be added, so this takes time. Requests set the build queue.
This tool is free and always will be. What it needs instead is your judgement
— whether the numbers match what you see in practice. Your answers shape the next release and
form part of a study on how clinicians read risk.
Anonymous · No patient data · You may stop at any point.
Every figure in this tool is attributed. This page shows what each figure is attributed to, and how far that attribution has been checked.
✓ Measured traced to a named paper or national audit, checked against the original, and dated. The full citation appears on the figure.
● Guideline carried in the published guidance of a named professional body, not yet matched to a specific paper. Not a guess; not yet fully traced either.
≈ Extrapolated reasoned from an established procedure that shares the anatomy and technique, because the procedure itself has little published outcome data. The procedure it is reasoned from is always named on the figure. Newer fascial plane blocks fall here: the technique is real, the outcome data is thin, and saying so is more useful than implying a precision that does not exist.
Report it. Figures are corrected, not defended. Three were corrected in this build after checking against the original audits — each correction is recorded and visible on the figure.